dispositivo contraceptivo intrauterino
Revisado por Dr Doug McKechnie, MRCGPÚltima atualização por Dr Toni Hazell, MRCGPÚltima atualização 30 Jan 2024
Atende aos diretrizes editoriais
- BaixarBaixar
- Compartilhar
- Language
- Discussão
- Versão em Áudio
Profissionais de Saúde
Os artigos de Referência Profissional são projetados para uso por profissionais de saúde. Eles são escritos por médicos do Reino Unido e baseados em evidências de pesquisa, diretrizes do Reino Unido e da Europa. Você pode encontrar o dispositivo contraceptivo intrauterinoartigo mais útil, ou um dos nossos outros artigos de saúde.
Neste artigo:
This article refers to copper-containing intrauterine contraceptive devices (Cu-IUDs).
For information on Mirena®, Jaydess®, Kyleena®, Levosert® and Benilexa®, the levonorgestrel intrauterine devices (LNG-IUD), see the separate Levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) article. For information regarding IUD and LNG-IUD insertion, see the separate Intrauterine Contraceptives (IUD and LNG-IUD) - Management .
Continue lendo abaixo
What is a copper-containing intrauterine contraceptive device?
The Cu-IUD is a long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC). It is typically T-shaped or frameless and is anchored to the myometrium at the fundus. The amount of copper in the device and the type of frame (structure) can affect the effectiveness of different models. The T- shaped models with a surface area of 380 mm2 of copper have the lowest failure rates. Earlier models with lower effectiveness are no longer produced worldwide.
The addition of small quantities of silver to the core prevents fragmentation of the copper, extending the lifespan and efficacy. In some countries the addition of other noble metals such as gold is used for the same effect.
Cost-effectiveness
Voltar ao conteúdoThe National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) advises that all currently available LARC methods (Cu-IUDs, the LNG-IUD, injectable contraceptives e implants) are more cost-effective than the combined oral contraceptive (COC) pill even at one year of use.1 IUDs, the LNG-IUD and implants are also more cost-effective than the injectable contraceptives. NICE also advises that increasing the uptake of LARC methods will reduce the numbers of unintended pregnancies. It is important that women should be advised of LARC methods when seeking contraception.
Although IUDs are used by large numbers of women, global distribution of their use is uneven. In a few countries, including China and most of Central Asia, IUDs constitute at least half of all contraceptive use.2 In Northern Africa and the Middle East, they represent about a quarter of all use, and in parts of Europe, about a fifth. In the Americas, IUD use is generally well below 10%. In the UK their use is between 11.3 and 12.1%.3
Continue lendo abaixo
Modo de ação
Voltar ao conteúdoThe primary mode of action is through setting up a cytotoxic inflammatory reaction in the endometrium, which is spermicidal.
The copper concentration in cervical mucus is also substantial and inhibits sperm motility.
The copper devices may also prevent implantation if fertilisation occurs. However, the studies suggesting this were of older devices with lower copper content, and there is no clear evidence that modern devices allow fertilisation to occur.
When used for emergency contraception, the primary mechanism of a Cu-IUD is inhibition of fertilisation, due to the toxic effect of the IUD on the sperm and egg. If fertilisation has already occurred, the IUD may prevent implantation by causing an inflammatory reaction.4
Eficácia
Voltar ao conteúdoMany factors determine efficacy in individual women, including sexual activity, age and parity.
Cumulative pregnancy rates for IUDs with a copper content >300 mm2are noted as being between 0.1% and 1.1% after the first year of use and around 2.2% for the TCu380A after 12 years.4
A Cochrane review shows a non-significant trend towards a higher failure rate at 1 and 3 years for those using the frameless GyneFix® compared to the TCu380A.4
Over 12 years of use, the models with less surface area of copper have higher failure rates.
Continue lendo abaixo
Duration of action
Voltar ao conteúdoAll Cu-IUDs are licensed for at least five years of use and some are recommended for longer use.4
The TCu380S (TT 380® Slimline and T-Safe® 380A QuickLoad) is licensed for 10 years of use.
FSRH guidance states that if a Cu-IUD with over 300mm2 of copper is inserted when a woman is 40 years or over it can be retained and will remain effective until the menopause is confirmed.4
Escolha do dispositivo
Voltar ao conteúdoLonger-acting devices are generally preferred, as this reduces the risks associated with removal and re-insertion (perforation, infection, expulsion).
Short-stemmed devices can be used if the uterine cavity is less than 6.5 cm at sounding.
Types of device currently available in the UK 4
Device | Copper content (mm2) | Uterine length (cm) | Licensed use duration (years) |
Framed, banded copper arms | |||
Copper T380 A | 380 | 6.5–9 | 10 |
T-Safe® 380A QL | 380 | 6.5–9 | 10 |
T-Safe® 380 A | 380 | 6.6–9 | 10 |
TT 380® Slimline | 380 | ≥7 | 10 |
Flexi-T ® + 380 | 380 | ≥6 | 5 |
Mini TT380® Slimline | 380 | 5–7 | 5 |
Framed, copper in stem only | |||
Nova-T ® 380 | 380 | 6.5–9 | 5 |
UT380 Standard® | 380 | 6.5–9 | 5 |
Neo-Safe® T380 | 380 | 6.5–9 | 5 |
Novaplus T 380® Cu | 380 | 6.5–9 | 5 |
Novaplus T 380® Cu ‘mini’ | 380 | 'mini’ size = 5 5 | 5 |
UT380 Short® | 380 | ≥5 | 5 |
Multiload® Cu375 | 375 | 6–9 | 5 |
Multi-Safe® 375 | 375 | 6–9 | 5 |
Ancora® 375 Cu | 375 | ≥6.5 | 5 |
Load® 375 | 375 | ≥7 | 5 |
Flexi-T ® 300 | 300 | 6.6–9 | 5 |
Frameless | |||
GyneFix® 330 GyneFix® 200 | 330 200 | Suitable for all uterine sizes | 5 5 |
Silver IUD | |||
Novaplus T380® Ag | 380 | ‘Normal’ size = 6.5–9 ‘Mini’ size = 5 | 5 |
Indicações
Voltar ao conteúdoContracepção
For most women seeking contraception, the Cu-IUD is a safe option.
Any Cu-IUD sited in a woman aged over 40 years, can be safely left in situ until the menopausa; however, it is only licensed for 10 years use, use for longer is within FSRH guidance, but outside of the product license.4
It can be a particularly useful option for women whose contraceptive choices are restricted due to the necessary use of enzyme-inducing drugs for other conditions, which interact with many hormonal contraceptives.5 (see the separate Contracepção e Grupos Especiais artigo).
Advantages as a contraceptive method include:
Rapid return of fertility post-removal.
Convenience (long-lasting method that is independent of intercourse).
No hormonal content.
Disadvantages include heavier and more painful menstruation and the discomfort of fitting.
Contracepção de emergência6
Insertion of a copper-banded IUD prevents conception in 98% of women if:
Unprotected sexual intercourse (UPSI) occurred before insertion and there is a risk of pregnancy; a Cu-IUD can safely be inserted up to five days after the first episode of UPSI or within five days of the earliest expected time of ovulation.
For a woman with a regular four-week cycle, this means that an IUD can be inserted up to and including day 19 of her cycle, regardless of when the unprotected sex took place following her last period. However, the LMP must be accurately known and cycles must be regular in order to make the estimation.
The Cu-IUD should always be offered to a woman who is seeking emergency contraception, as it is the most effective method. It may be particularly useful in the following situations:
Efficacy is the woman's main priority. The Cu-IUD is more effective than emergency hormonal contraception, with a failure rate of < 0.1%.6
Exposure occurred up to five days ago, including multiple exposures within this period.
It is to be retained as a long-term method of contraception.
There is contra-indication to hormonal methods.
Veja o artigo separado sobre Intrauterine Contraceptives (IUD and LNG-IUD) - Management article for details on choice of device.
NB: the LNG-IUD is not suitable for emergency contraception.
Contra-indicações
Voltar ao conteúdoAbsolute and strong relative contra-indications7
There are few absolute evidence-based contra-indications and they fall into five categories: infection, pregnancy, uterine factors, gynaecological cancers and adverse reactions to copper. The following list are either UKMEC 4 (absolutely contraindicated) or UKMEC 3 (risks generally outweigh benefits) for insertion of a new device - in many cases the continued use of a device which is already in place is not a contraindication, or sits at a lower level such as UKMEC 2 (benefits generally outweigh risks).
Infection or increased risk of complications should an infection arise
UKMEC 4:
Current pelvic inflammatory disease (PID),purulent cervicitis, gonorreia or symptomatic clamídia.
Current postpartum or post-abortion sepsis.
Pelvic tuberculose.
UKMEC 3:
Asymptomatic clamídia.
Complicated organ transplant eg, graft failure, rejection or cardiac allograft vasculopathy.
HIV with a CD4 count of <200 cells/mm3.
Gravidez
UKMEC 3:
Between 48 hours and four weeks postpartum. UK medical eligibility criteria (UKMEC) state that risks generally outweigh benefits if postpartum insertion occurs between 48 hours and four weeks. Beyond four weeks postpartum, benefits outweigh risks, even if the woman is breastfeeding (there is no increased copper level in breast milk).7
Uterine factors
UKMEC 4:
Undiagnosed vaginal bleeding which is suspicious for a serious condition, before evaluation.
UKMEC 3:
Uterine miomas or other uterine abnormality such as a bicornuate uterus with distortion of the uterine cavity.
Gynaecological cancers
UKMEC 4:
Endometrial cancer.
Cervical cancer awaiting treatment.
Gestational trophoblastic disease which is malignant or has persistently elevated hCG levels.
UKMEC 3:
Cervical cancer after radical trachelectomy.
Gestational trophoblastic disease.
Malignant trophoblastic disease.
Adverse reactions to copper
Copper allergy or Wilson's disease do not feature in the UKMEC, but they are listed as contraindications in the SPCs of many Cu-IUDs and the FSRH guidance on intrauterine contraception says that the Cu-IUD is not recommended in those with Wilson's disease or an allergy or sensitivity to any components of the device.
Outros fatores
UKMEC 3:
Known long QT syndrome (due to the increased risks of a cardiac event if there is a vasovagal reaction and bradycardia - fitting in hospital should be considered).
Relative contra-indications - UKMEC 2 (benefits usually outweigh risks):7
Age under 20 (due to a small increased risk of expulsion).
At the time of a second trimester abortion (due to a small increased risk of expulsion).
Uncomplicated organ transplant.
Complicated valvular and congenital heart disease (eg, pulmonary hypertension or a history of subacute bacterial endocarditis). A woman who is on review only annually and is asymptomatic with no cardiac medication would generally be considered to have uncomplicated disease, but if in doubt, discussion with the patient's cardiologist would be sensible.
Cardiomyopathy with impaired cardiac function.
Heavy or prolonged bleeding, endometriosis or severe dysmenorrhoea (these conditions may worsen with use of a Cu-IUD - a LNG-IUD would be a better choice to improve symptoms).
Uterine abnormalities without distortion of the uterine cavity, for example cervical stenosis or laceration.
Current infections not listed above (eg, hepatitis, Trichomonas vaginalis, other infective vaginitis or bacterial vaginosis).
Being at an increased risk for STIs (the UKMEC does not define who is at increased risk).
HIV with a CD4 count > 200 cells/mm3.
Thalassaemia.
Doença falciforme.
Iron deficiency anaemia.
Insertion at the time of termination of pregnancy
A inserção durante a interrupção cirúrgica da gravidez é segura e prática. Muitas vezes pode ser um momento conveniente para realizar o procedimento e evita desconforto. As taxas de expulsão são marginalmente aumentadas.
Special groups4
Voltar ao conteúdoAdolescents and those who have never been sexually active
The available evidence suggests that IUDs are safe, effective and acceptable for adolescents, although expulsion rates and rates of painful or difficult insertions may be higher than in older women.
There is no increased rate of adverse effects, early discontinuation or pregnancy in adolescents compared to older women.
Fitting may be more challenging in those who have never been sexually active, but the FSRH guidance advises that it appears to be well tolerated.
Nulliparous women
The Cu-IUD is a recommended form of contraception for nulliparous women.
Nulliparous women have, on average, a shorter endometrial cavity length - the minimum cavity length for each device should be considered if this is an issue.
There is no increased risk of expulsion in nulliparous women compared to those who have given birth, but there is an increased risk of difficult or painful fitting.
Trans men and those with a gender identity other than female
Testosterone, as used for gender transition, is not contraceptive and may be teratogenic - for those who wish to avoid hormones, the Cu-IUD may be a useful contraceptive method, although use may be limited by heavier periods which can trigger a worsening of gender dysphoria. For this reason the LNG-IUD is more commonly used, as amenorrhoea is often welcome.
Genital examination and IUD fitting may trigger worsening gender dysphoria; an experienced member of staff should carry out such a fitting.
Complicações4
Voltar ao conteúdoFor complications associated directly with the insertion process, including perforation, expulsion and lost threads, see the separate Intrauterine Contraceptives (IUD and LNG-IUD) - Management .
Altered or abnormal bleeding
Prolonged, heavier and more painful periods are common after insertion of a Cu-IUD, and are the most common reason for discontinuation of the device.
For women using an IUD, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can be used to treat spotting, light bleeding or prolonged menses. Thrombolytics such as tranexamic acid may be used for menorrhagia.
Heavy bleeding should make the clinician consider the possibility of early pregnancy at the time of insertion.
Menstrual bleeding and pain are the most common reasons for early discontinuation of intrauterine contraception.
As always, bleeding which has an abnormal pattern or seems worse than that usually associated with an adverse effect of a contraceptive, should be investigated for a pathological cause.
Pelvic infection
This is most strongly related to the insertion procedure and to the background risk of STIs.
The risk of pelvic infection is increased in the first 3 weeks after insertion, but remains low (<1%).
If pelvic infection is suspected in a woman using any type of IUD then antibiotics should be started.
The device does not need to be removed unless symptoms fail to resolve within 72 hours; if this is necessary then the possibility of pregnancy should be considered if there has been intercourse in the last 7 days - emergency contraception and a follow-up pregnancy test may be needed.
Women should be followed up and their partners treated where appropriate. Sexual health risk assessment and counselling should be offered.
Actinomyces-like organisms
Actinomyces-like organisms (ALOs) are commensals of the female genital tract and have been identified in women with and without intrauterine contraception.
Their role in infection in women using intrauterine contraception is not clear.
If ALOs are seen on a swab or smear, removal of the device is not indicated if the woman is asymptomatic. This incidental finding on a smear test has become much less common since the advent of primary HPV testing and the use of liquid-based cytology.4 8
If symptoms of pelvic pain occur in conjunction with the presence of ALOs, other causes of infection should be considered and removal of the device may be advisable, possibly after discussion with local microbiology or gynaecology teams. If it is removed then it should be sent for culture and appropriate antibiotics given, depending on local protocols.
Gravidez
Ectopic pregnancy must be excluded although most pregnancies will be intrauterine.
Ectopic pregnancy is increased relative to normal pregnancies where copper devices are used. However, the absolute risk of an ectopic pregnancy is greatly reduced, because the absolute risk of any type of pregnancy is reduced.
Women who become pregnant must be counselled regarding the increased risk of miscarriage, infection and preterm delivery if the device remains in situ, and that removal reduces these outcomes but is associated with a small risk of miscarriage.
If threads are visible or retrievable in the endocervical canal, the device should be removed up to 12 weeks of gestation. There is little evidence on the management of those who are more than 12 weeks gestation or do not have visible threads - decisions should be made by the obstetric team on a case by case basis.
If not removed, the device should be sought at delivery or termination and, if not detected at this time, an abdominal X-ray performed to ensure it is not extrauterine.
Removal and return of fertility
Voltar ao conteúdoEvidence suggests that the IUD does not delay return to fertility after removal.
Where pregnancy is desired
The IUD can be removed at any time.
Where pregnancy is not desired
The IUD should be removed with menstruation or, if there has been no unprotected sexual intercourse in the previous seven days, at other times - if this is not possible, consider the need for emergency contraception.
Where the IUD is to be exchanged, intercourse should be avoided for the previous seven days in case re-insertion fails.
Where removal is at the end of the licensed duration use: remove at any time in the menstrual cycle. If pregnancy is to be avoided, remove in the first few days after the onset of menstruation or advise condoms or abstinence from sexual intercourse for at least seven days before the procedure in case re-insertion is not possible.
When switching to combined hormonal contraception (CHC), remove after seven consecutive days of effective CHC use, or if starting CHC on the day of removal, use condoms for the first 7 days after the switch.9
When switching to the depot or implant progestogen methods, remove the IUD after seven days of use of the new method.
Postmenopausal removal
If inserted after the age of 40 years, the IUD can continue to be used and will remain effective for contraception until the menopause is confirmed.
Summary of main points
Voltar ao conteúdo
| IUD |
Método de ação | Inhibits sperm mobility, prevents fertilisation and inhibits implantation. |
Duration of action | 5-10 years if contains 380 mm2 copper. If inserted at age 40 or over, will work until the menopause even if that is longer than 10 years |
Taxa de falha | 0.8% per year. 10 Only the LNG-IUD, the implant and sterilisation have a lower failure rate. |
Riscos | PID incidence is less than 1% if there is low risk for STI. Perforation incidence is less than 1 - 2 per 1,000 for most women but is increased if the woman is breastfeeding. 4 Ectopic pregnancy risk is 1 in 20, if pregnant with IUD in situ. |
Effect on menses | Increased menstrual loss and dysmenorrhoea. |
Return to fertility | No delay. |
Advice given at fitting | Pain and discomfort last a few hours, followed by light bleeding for a few days. Watch for signs of perforation. No routine follow-up is needed, but the woman should return if she has signs suggestive of infection, cannot feel the threads, or has other concerns. |
Dr. Mary Lowth é autora ou a autora original deste folheto.
Dr. Hazell foi a bolsista de eLearning no atual curso de eLearning do RCGP sobre contracepção, que foi desenvolvido em parceria com a Public Health England e a Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. Ela é a presidente da biblioteca de saúde da mulher do RCGP, que envolve a ligação com a FSRH. Ela escreveu e falou sobre contracepção em várias ocasiões - alguns desses compromissos foram financiados por empresas farmacêuticas que podem fabricar dispositivos intrauterinos de cobre.
Leitura adicional e referências
- DIU/SIU; Saúde Sexual de Lothian
- Contracepção reversível de longa duração; Diretriz Clínica NICE (Outubro 2005 - atualizada em Julho 2019)
- Daniele MAS, Cleland J, Benova L, et al; Provider and lay perspectives on intra-uterine contraception: a global review. Reprod Health. 2017 Sep 26;14(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0380-8.
- Firman N, Palmer MJ, Timaeus IM, et al; Uso de métodos contraceptivos entre mulheres e sua associação com idade, estado civil e duração: descobertas do terceiro Inquérito Nacional Britânico de Atitudes e Estilos de Vida Sexuais (Natsal-3). BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 25 de maio de 2018. pii: bmjsrh-2017-200037. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2017-200037.
- Contracepção Intrauterina; Unidade de Eficácia Clínica da Faculdade de Saúde Sexual e Reprodutiva (março de 2023 - última atualização julho de 2023)
- FSRH CEU Guidance: Drug Interactions with Hormonal Contraception; Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (May 2022)
- Orientação Clínica CEU: Contracepção de Emergência; Faculdade de Saúde Sexual e Reprodutiva (março de 2017 - atualizado em julho de 2023)
- Tabela Resumo dos Critérios de Elegibilidade Médica do Reino Unido para contracepção intrauterina e hormonal; Faculdade de Saúde Sexual e Reprodutiva, 2016 - emendado em setembro de 2019
- Contracepção - DIU; NICE CKS, janeiro de 2024 (acesso apenas no Reino Unido)
- Lesnewski R, Prine L, Ginzburg R; Preventing gaps when switching contraceptives. Am Fam Physician. 2011 Mar 1;83(5):567-70.
- Contracepção - avaliação; NICE CKS, janeiro de 2024 (acesso apenas no Reino Unido)
Continue lendo abaixo
Histórico do artigo
As informações nesta página são escritas e revisadas por clínicos qualificados.
Próxima revisão prevista para: 28 Jan 2029
30 Jan 2024 | Última versão

Pergunte, compartilhe, conecte-se.
Navegue por discussões, faça perguntas e compartilhe experiências em centenas de tópicos de saúde.

Sentindo-se mal?
Avalie seus sintomas online gratuitamente